yeah yeah.

i know.

i know.

I SUCK.

but, you wouldn't have it be any other way. n'on?

~↕↕~

~↕↕~

i don't really have anything else to say about This Gentleman, at the moment..
..i just thought he, too, was PURTY.



to date, i've only watched Jason in Transporter 2.

i did enjoy that film..
..´thought it was pretty slick.



i suppose i could say i like mr. statham's [Work] Ethic, if nothing else.

and another one...

...on this day, i will be exhibiting some pictures of the inimitable-Mathew St. Patrik.

(i've been feeling bad because i had been afraid it might appear to you-all that i don't find any black men Sexy; i want for you be At Rest, with assurance, that this indeed is the farthest thing from the truth, regarding your Dear Friend, and Humble N'rator.

~↕↕~

the best part about this particular exhibition is, this brotha i'm gonna be showin' ya is just that:

A BROTHA.

there ain't really nothin' White-, or even Mixed-, looking about this dude, whatsomnever.

so, none of you can proclaim well while you talk a good game, mane, about how you ain't limitin' yourself to just whites, [Interracial {Nikkiz}]^(♫-1), and [hispanics]^(♫-2), this dude you're showin' us is basically just a glorified White Boi WITH TAN.)



anyway: as with Eric Dane, i haven't ever looked at the show in which Mathew starred^(♫-3), either.



uh.. ..i haven't had Cable in my room for years.

obdurately.

obstinately.

and i still don't.



but, honestly, even if i did.. ..i pro'ly might notta watched, anyway.
unless, y'know, Mr. St. Patrik regularly did nude scenes.^(♫-4)

:-).

---

anyway, here is yet another presentation of SELECT IMAGES of a guy who hath catch my eye:

~↕↕~

♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥, indeed.

if i were a Bottom, i would definitely let him fuck me up my arse.

hell.

he might could ´suade me to do it now.

i mean.
you know.
if he were an actual [MSM]^(♫-5).

---

(♫-1) (Six Feet Under.)
(♫-2) (or, properly, Black/White-mixed)
(♫-3) (i, personally, prefer to use the term Latino ... even though i know that is limited in scope, too.)
(♫-4) (i don't know if he had ever, or no.)
(♫-5) (this term stands for Man-Seeking-Man.. ..although the more official way to say it is "Man who seeks {or would not reject, D'pending On The Circumstances} SEXUAL RELATIONS with other Men."

:-).

as i typed that, i remembered.. ..that Gender really is fluid.

indeed.)